Popular Posts

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Planning to Plan is No Way to Plan


Long Islanders used to get things accomplished. We built F-14 Tomcat’s that roared across the skies of Calverton, we discovered DNA in Cold Spring Harbor, and we invented the MRI at Stony Brook. These days, Long Islanders are known more for our high taxes and serial killers than our many historic accomplishments. This has to change. We, as the public, must become more engaged with our home.

As a young professional on the Island, I find it disconcerting how many of my contemporaries are disengaged with policy on Long Island. It’s not a sleek, sexy or fun topic, but policy is an important arena that permeates through all 2.7 million people who live on Long Island. Policy directly impacts the water we drink, taxes we owe, stores we frequent and quality of life. Sound land use plans shape our landscape for decades. The decisions being made now will directly impact each and every one of you for most of your adult life. The end result of my generation’s complacency is that the important decisions that I’ve outlined above are now being made by stakeholders, civics and policymakers who are detached from us. While some have good intentions, policies are being crafted by an older generation that basically will outline where live and work.

For example, the Town of Brookhaven recently voted to approve a measure that will plan two community planning sessions in the next months, in an effort to save the Carmans River, and create a much needed multifamily housing code. In the end of a long, arduous dog and pony show, the Town essentially voted to plan a meeting, where the “community” can plan. Planning to plan is not true planning. Planning is the process in which goals are set, data is collected, and the best approach is chosen to reach those goals.

Supporters of this approach tout this as an exercise in “Community-Based” planning. I say they are half correct, and challenge policymakers in the Town to take it a step further. Instead of actively engaging civics, who are so engrained in the development process that they themselves just as much insiders that they vehemently oppose, why not engage citizens from across the board, across a variety of age groups? Honestly, I am tired of being the youngest person in the various meetings, and I am 25. Why not craft land use policies that will support those not only in the 55-64 demographic, but 18-25 as well? It is almost comical to hear person after person speaking about “housing for our fleeing youth” and the “need to stop the brain drain”, yet none of my generation are actually there to say what type of housing we want, or why they are choosing to leave the Island.

It is the job of government to conduct planning studies, with full participation by the public. By “public”, I do not mean the same citizens who participate in the process time and time again, but rather, a wider, more accurate representation of the community. Villages, Towns and the Counties on Long Island should visit colleges, universities, solicit households and consistently interface with its constituents, asking them what they would like to see in their community, and how land use policies should be made. The findings of such a study should be made approachable to the public, and serve as an input to the Planners, who then will use an on the ground inventory to create an assessment of what is surplus and needed in the community. The end result should be a plan that is both implementable by government and created by the people. This is not a hopeful and whimsical request, but a throwback to the way planning used to be conducted, back when planning to plan was unnecessary. 

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Prescribed Burns 101



It is important for the public to understand the necessity of a sound prescribed burn program for the Pine Barrens region. What follows is a comprehensive look at what prescribed burns are, how they work and why they are necessary:

Prescribed burns are a forestry and management technique that ensures the ecosystems follow their natural reproductive cycles, as well as reduce the intensity of naturally occurring wildfires. According to the University of Idaho, Each prescribed burn has a series of objectives that serve to protect the ecosystem, and protect the public from uncontrollable wildfires:

·         Fuel reduction
·         Expose mineral soil for seedbeds for regeneration of wind-disseminated species
·         Control of insects, diseases, and competing vegetation
·         Improvement of natural ecosystems, wildlife habitat, and range forest[1]

The purpose of the prescribed burns vary by region and ecosystem:

Prescribed burns are used most frequently to maintain and restore native grasslands. Prescribed burning can recycle nutrients tied up in old plant growth, control many woody plants and herbaceous weeds, improve poor quality forage, increase plant growth, reduce the risk of large wildfires, and improve certain wildlife habitat. To achieve the above benefits, fire must be used under very specific conditions, using very specific techniques. 
Burning is also more cost-effective than other treatments like bulldozing, cutting, or chemicals.[2]
 
Historically, wildfires were set by Native Americans to promote growth of grasslands:

Native Americans deliberately set fires to clear land for horticulture, to improve access, and to change the composition of the plant community to attract game species. Early settlers set fires to assist in preparing the soil for agriculture and to eliminate stubble from the fields in the fall.[3]

According to the Private Land Partnerships and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, the timing of the burn, paired with the weather, have a large influence on how successful a prescribed burn is: 

The timing of a burn determines the plants which will be benefited and controlled, the impact on wildlife species, and safety. Most burns are conducted mid to late spring, or in the fall. Burning to favor desired grasses should take place just as they are starting to green up, and the soil surface is damp. Generally, a late spring burn will control woody vegetation and cool season grasses better than an early spring burn but are not as beneficial for wildflowers. This burn will also provide warm season grasses with nutrients they need to grow. 

Before burning, nesting times of grassland species should always be checked to prevent the destruction of nests and their inhabitants. The best time for spring fires is late March into April; generally in the morning or evening, when the relative humidity and temperature are not changing as rapidly as during daylight hours. The drier the area the earlier the burn should be to avoid damaging the earliest blooming wildflowers. Though fall burns are possible and can be beneficial, they are often avoided, due to the cooler temperatures, drier ground, and destruction to winter wildlife habitat they may cause. 

Weather has an overriding effect on a prescribed burn. A burn plan will outline the weather conditions, which must be met before the burn is conducted. It is very important to have the latest and most updated weather conditions available before starting the burn. Relative humidity is an important factor to consider when planning a controlled burn. If the relative humidity is below 50%, the dryness of the grass is prone to causing very hot fires. If the relative humidity is above 70% the fire will have a hard time catching at all. Therefore a relative humidity between 50% and 70% works best. 

Temperature is also important when laying out a burn plan because of its relation to relative humidity. Below 32 degrees Fahrenheit grass mats will rarely burn, and above 80 degrees Fahrenheit burning is hazardous. Between 40 degree Fahrenheit and 60 degrees Fahrenheit is ideal.[4]

Most prescribed burns are lit by crews using the drip torch, a hand-carried device that pours out a small stream of burning fuel.[5]
 
In the Pine Barrens region in particular, prescribed burns are necessary in ensuring the vitality of the ecosystem, and maintaining the pitch pine forest. According to the NYS DEC, very hot, uncontrolled wildfires can negatively impact the Pine Barrens:

Some prescribed burning (controlled fires) needs to be performed to restore the habitat to savannah rather than forest and also to reduce the fuel load that is building up in the brush layers and can lead to catastrophic wildfire. Catastrophic wildfire may convert the pine-oak forest and savannah to predominantly oak forest. This occurs in a very hot fire that kills the trees and seeds, but allows the oaks to regenerate from the stump. Controlled fires remove the litter and control succession, without changing the vegetative community from pine-oak.[6]

Under the current Wildlife Task Force (WTF) Fire Management Plan, prescribed burns are carefully planned by trained staff. The conditions are heavily controlled, and personnel in charge are highly trained: 


Each prescribed burn is carried out only under carefully prescribed conditions of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and humidity. Such burns are carefully planned and timed, with firebreaks prepared ahead of time. All prescribed burns are conducted by a trained and qualified crew, supervised by a prescribed fire incident commander (also referred to as a "burn boss" or "fire leader") who has additional training and experience in fire management. Volunteer fire departments are not expected to carry the burden or to provide resources including personnel or equipment. However, fire departments should participate in the planning, and in the event of an escape and the prescribed burn being declared a wildfire, the local fire chief could be called upon to serve as Incident Commander.[7]

The above structure of management that controls each prescribed burn highlights how controlled these events are. Historically, fires have occurred to help the ecosystem repopulate, but solid data on frequency of fires in the Pine Barrens region is sparse. In the research I’ve found, it seems that data is hard to find because the frequency of fires in the Pine Barrens depends on a variety of factors, as outlined by the below USDA report:

The dry open conditions and drought prone soils of the pine barrens created conditions favorable for recurrent fires that played a large role in the creation, appearance, and maintenance of the pine barrens community (Radeloff et al. 2000). Fire was frequent throughout the pine barrens, but the fire intensity and return interval varied (Curtis 1959, Vogl 1970, Radeloff et al. 1998). On a given site, the disturbance history determines the composition and structure of the community. Reconstruction of the historic or pre-settlement forest can be a useful tool; however, it is important to note that human activity and climatic change have greatly influenced ecosystems (Landres et al. 1999, Schulte et al. 2001).[8]

Overall, prescribed burns are essential to maintaining the Pine Barrens ecosystem, and protecting the welfare of residents in the region. The DEC should be given greater resources that allow more prescribed burns to occur, over a variety of areas within the Pine Barrens. The longer that the area goes without burning, the more fuel accumulates, which leads to more intense, rapidly spreading fires that are unplanned. Prescribed burns help mitigate against the impacts of wildfire, and help reduce their size and costs to both human life and property.


[1] Geospatial Training and Analysis Cooperative, Prescribed Burns,  http://geology.isu.edu/geostac/Field_Exercise/wildfire/prescribedburns.htm
[2] Prescribed Burning ,  Private Land Partnerships, http://www.michigandnr.com/publications/pdfs/huntingwildlifehabitat/landowners_guide/Habitat_Mgmt/Grassland/Prescribed_Burning.htm
[3] Geospatial Training and Analysis Cooperative, Prescribed Burns,  http://geology.isu.edu/geostac/Field_Exercise/wildfire/prescribedburns.htm
[4] Prescribed Burning ,  Private Land Partnerships, http://www.michigandnr.com/publications/pdfs/huntingwildlifehabitat/landowners_guide/Habitat_Mgmt/Grassland/Prescribed_Burning.htm
[5] US Forest Service, Fire and Aviation Management, Prescribed Burns, http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fireuse/rxfire/rx_index.html
[6] David A. Sarnoff Pine Barrens Preserve BCA Management Guidance Summary, NYS DEC
[7] Appendix B: Development of a Prescribed Burning Plan, NYS Central Pine Barrens Joint Policy and Planning Commission, http://pb.state.ny.us/cpb_plan/appendix_b.htm
[8] Restoration of the Pine Barrens Ecosystem, Resource Report for the Northwest Sands Project, USDA Matt Bushman, September 2009

Monday, April 9, 2012

Fire in the Pine Barrens: A Quick Introduction

While watching the coverage of the fires in the Pine Barrens, I was surprised at how little was known about not only the region, but the emergency plans in place in case of wildfires. What follows is a quick introduction to the why the Pine Barrens burns, and the State's plan for action:


Since the 1995 brush fires raged across Sunrise Highway, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has been preparing for the next large-scale fire event. 

Long Island’s East End is particularly vulnerable to forest fire due to the nature of the Pine Barrens ecosystem. The Pine Barrens is divided into two distinct sections. First, there is the 55,000 acre Core Preservation Area. In the Core, development is restricted. In the second section, there is the 47,000 acre Compatible Growth Area, where limited development is allowed under strict guidelines. In general, the Pine Barrens is sparsely populated.

In the Pine Barrens, fire is a natural part of the forest’s cycle, with the intense heat allowing the seeds of the Pitch Pine to open, germinate and reforest. Historically, Native Americans burned large swaths of Pine Barrens land in a checkerboard pattern, creating diverse successional shrub lands, old growth forests and transition areas which served to vary their hunting and foraging grounds. In recent years, suburban development boomed in the region, with subdivisions abutting potential burn sites.

The Department of Environmental Conservation, as well as Brookhaven National Laboratory, has in the past conducted “prescribed burns”, which serve to prevent fires in the Pine Barrens, as well as revegetate the native species: 

The passage of the Long Island Pine Barrens Protection Act and the completion of a comprehensive land use plan are important steps in the protection of the pine barrens. For these measures to be effective, however, this planning stage must be followed by prompt acquisition of key areas in the pine barrens core, careful review of proposed development in the compatible growth area, and appropriate management of the entire area, including fire management. Management of public lands within the pine barrens must be focused on maintaining the ecological integrity of the pine barrens as a whole and the rare ecological communities and species within the pine barrens. Perpetuation of the area's unique pine barrens communities and associated rare plants, in which fire has historically played an important ecological role, needs to be the primary management goal for the individual sites and the complex as a whole. After the wildfires of 1995, a Central Pine Barrens task force was convened to develop a wildfire management strategy. In addition to or in coordination with this plan, which will focus on fire prevention and suppression, fire management plans for prescribed burning need to be specifically developed and implemented for the full spectrum of ecologically-significant sites occurring over the general area;[1]

Due to funding cuts in recent years, these burns have been done fewer times, leading to large tracts of land very susceptible to long, hot, rapidly spreading burns. Luckily, much of the Pine Barrens 150,000 acres is sparsely populated, but the threat of property damage still looms.

Proper fire management and emergency planning is critical, for there are over 59,000 people and over 23,000 residential units within the Central Pine Barrens Region on Long Island. Since the 1995 blaze, which consumed 7,000 acres and caused 400 people to be evacuated, the Central Pine Barrens Wildfire Task Force (WTF) has worked to create a Fire Management Plan that centralizes response, and allocates funding resources towards equipment needed to fight forest fires located far from traditional roads and infrastructure. The Wild Fire Task force serves as a communication vehicle among agencies that play a role in maintaining and protecting the area. The WTF consists of 41 agencies and organizations, including Federal, State, county, and local agencies, private organizations, and volunteer fire departments, that own property or have other vested interest in fire protection within the Central Pine Barrens.[2] 

Since 1995, various strategic “firebreaks”, as defined below, have been put into place:

“(also called a fireroad, fire line or fuel break) is a gap in vegetation or other combustible material that acts as a barrier to slow or stop the progress of a bushfire or wildfire. A firebreak may occur naturally where there is a lack of vegetation or "fuel", such as a river, lake or canyon. Firebreaks may also be man-made, and many of these also serve as roads, such as a logging road, four-wheel drive trail, secondary road, or a highway.” [3]

The Plan crafted by the WTF has the following components:

Finalized in 1999, the Central Pine Barrens Fire Management Plan includes protocols for incident response, mobilization, and resource deployment; a determination of the wildfire suppression techniques appropriate for use in the Central Pine Barrens; fire prevention education programs; fuel reduction techniques including prescribed burning; and a standard system of record keeping for fire incidents. Several subcommittees were created to help the task force implement the fire plan, including those focusing on fire protection assessments, prescribed fire, public education, fire weather, equipment and training, air-ground firefighting coordination, and fire investigation[4].

While prevention plans are in place, persistently dry weather, neglect and often absent-mindedness contribute to a volatile cocktail of factors that elevate the threat of wildfires on eastern Long Island.

With a plan in place, the Towns and County are ready to fight the wildfires, under the authority of the State. While the role of the Central Pine Barrens Commission is not widely known by Long Islanders, their work is important in planning for not only the stewardship of the region, but for the safety of the residents who reside within the Pine Barrens.


In news coverage of the Pine Barrens fires, viewers have heard that “the fire is contained, but not controlled”. The two terms have distinct definitions, as outlined below:

A fire is not considered "controlled" until it's all the way out. Until then, firefighters work toward "containing" the fire. Here's one way to think of it: Think of a container -- say, a mason jar. A fire is contained when it's all "bottled in," like in a container. The fire may still be burning, but if a distinct fire line is built around the entire perimeter so that there is no chance for the fire to escape or spot over outside the line, then the fire fighters declare the fire "contained."

After containing the fire, the next step is to get it under control -- that is, make sure it is dead out -- no hot spots, no floating embers, nothing that will flare up again if a breeze should come along.[1]

Post fire, the final clean up is called the “mop-up”, which occurs once the fire stops spreading. Mop-up involves cooling burning areas inside the fire line with tools and water, managing burning debris to reduce further spread, and "blackening."[2]

Not every wildfire is the same. In general, there are three different classes of wildfires, each with a different rate in which they spread:

A "surface fire" is the most common type and burns along the floor of a forest, moving slowly and killing or damaging trees. A "ground fire" is usually started by lightning and burns on or below the forest floor in the human layer down to the mineral soil. "Crown fires" spread rapidly by wind and move quickly by jumping along the tops of trees.[3]

In determining how fires start, investigators start with finding the Point-of-Origin, or where the blaze began.[4] To find the Point-of-Origin, fire investigators, with the knowledge that wildfires burn in a V or U-shaped pattern, look at the widest part of the V or U, and work their way backward. Once they hone in on the Point-of-Origin, investigators look for clues in a small, contained scene as to what started the blaze. Using traditional crime-scene investigation techniques, along with eyewitness accounts, lightning strike data and satellite imagery, investigators can piece together a fire’s cause.


[1] Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center http://www.idahofireinfo.blm.gov/east/q_and_a.html
[2] Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center http://www.idahofireinfo.blm.gov/east/q_and_a.html
[3] http://www.disastercenter.com/guide/wildfire.html
[4] How Do Investigators Determine if a Wildfire was Caused by Arson? Julia Layton, HowStuffWorks.com

[1] Significant Habitats and Habitat Complexes of the New York Bight Watershed, Long Island Pine Barrens- Peconic River Complex #8,  http://library.fws.gov/pubs5/web_link/text/li_pine.htm
[2] The Central Pine Barrens of Long Island, New York: Steps to Improve Community Preparedness for Wildfire http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/bro/longisland.pdf
[3] The Jersey Shore by Karl Hess: Fire Breaks Created in the Pine Barrens
[4] The Central Pine Barrens of Long Island, New York: Steps to Improve Community Preparedness for Wildfire http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/bro/longisland.pdf